A2L Item 022
- Description: Compare the travel times of two different masses travelling down differently-shaped ramps.
- Goal: Link energy and kinematic quantities.
- Source: UMPERG
- Keywords: Conservation, Dynamics, Energy, Mechanics
The question for students:
Two masses, m and M, are released from rest at a height H above the ground. Mass m slides down a curved surface while M slides down an incline as shown. Both surfaces are frictionless and M > m.
Which of the following statements is true?
- The time it takes for m to reach the end of the surface is longer because the path it takes is longer.
- The time it takes is the same since both masses are released from the same height.
- The time it takes for M to reach the end of the incline is less because its horizontal acceleration is larger.
- The time it takes for m to reach the end of the surface is shorter because it has a larger acceleration initially and therefore builds speed more quickly.
- The time it takes is the same since both masses have the same displacement.
- The time it takes is the same because both masses have the same speed at the end.
- The times cannot be compared without knowing the masses of the blocks.
- More than one statement above is correct
- None of the above statements is correct.
Commentary for teachers:
Answer
(4); even though both blocks arrive at the bottom with the same speed, m has a larger initial acceleration and attains a larger speed faster than M, despite having to travel a slightly longer distance. This item helps to focus attention on identifying those salient characteristics of the problem that relate to the time it takes the blocks to slide down the ramps. Some students will cue on the distance traveled, some on the differing masses of the blocks, some on m picking up speed faster than M.
Background
The curved surface makes it impossible for students to use either kinematics or Newton’s Second Law to determine the exact time it takes m to reach the bottom. Some students may correctly conclude that both blocks arrive at the bottom with the same speed, and thereby erroneously conclude that this must mean they arrive at the same time as well.
The curved track case also offers an opportunity to explore whether students realize that the total work done by the gravitational force goes into changing the kinetic energy of the block, even with a normal force present since this normal force does no work on the block.
Questions to Reveal Student Reasoning
What features of the problem determine the time it takes the masses to reach the bottom?
What’s the same about both blocks if they are released from the same height? What’s different?
Does traveling a shorter distance always mean less time?
Suggestions
For those who answered (1), ask what would happen to the time it would take M to reach the bottom if the 45° angle were made more, or less steep (think of the top vertex of the triangle being on a hinge). Clearly in the limit where M would drop vertically a distance SQRT(H2+L2), the time it would take to reach the other vertex of the hypoteneuse would be shorter than for any angle less than 90°.